Browsing by Author "Peters, Barry"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pharmacokinetics of Two Randomized Trials Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Indinavir, Saquinavir and Lopinavir in Combination with Low-Dose Ritonavir: The MaxCmin1 and 2 Trials
    (2007-08-10) Justesen, Ulrik S; Fox, Zoe; Pedersen, Court; Cahn, Pedro; Gerstoft, Jan; Clumeck, Nathan; Losso, Marcello; Peters, Barry; Obel, Niels; Castagna, Antonella; Dragsted, Ulrik B; Lundgren, Jens D; n behalf of the MaxCmin1 and 2 trial groups
    Abstract: Our objective was to identify possible differences in protease inhibitor plasma concentrations between and within three protease inhibitor regimens (indinavir, saquinavir and lopinavir all in combination with low-dose ritonavir) and to relate these differences to safety and efficacy. Data originated from pre-defined pharmacokinetic substudies within two randomized 48-week trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of three protease inhibitor regimens. At weeks 4 and 48, plasma was collected and minimum drug plasma concentrations, Cmin, were obtained. Out of 656 randomized patients, 283 patients had available Cmin at week 4. Indinavir, saquinavir and lopinavir Cmin were high when combined with low-dose ritonavir. No significant difference in the proportion of patients experiencing treatment failure could be found according to the Cmin within any treatment arm. A saquinavir Cmin > 2000 ng/ml was associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal grade 3 or 4 adverse events and higher total cholesterol. Overall, there were no changes in Cmin from week 4 to week 48 in patients who remained on therapy. No association between treatment failure and the Cmin could be demonstrated. Associations between high Cmin and toxicity were identified in the saquinavir arm; therefore, dose reductions may be appropriate in certain patients with Cmin several times above the minimum effective concentration.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Randomized Trial to Evaluate Indinavir/Ritonavir versus Saquinavir/Ritonavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Patients: The MaxCmin1 Trial
    (2003-09-01) Dragsted, Ulrik Bak; Gerstoft, Jan; Pedersen, Court; Peters, Barry; Duran, Adriana; Obel, Niels; Castagna, Antonella; Cahn, Pedro; Clumeck, Nathan; Bruun, Johan N; Benetucci, Jorge; Hill, Andrew; Cassetti, Isabel; Vernazza, Pietro; Youle, Mike; Fox, Zoe; MaxCmin1 Trial Group
    This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1–infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectively. The time to virological failure did not differ between study arms (P=.76). When switching from randomized treatment was counted as failure, this was seen in 78 of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 51 of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.009). A switch from the randomized treatment occurred in 64 (41%) of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 40 (27%) of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.013). Sixty-four percent of the switches occurred because of adverse events. A greater number of treatment-limiting adverse events were observed in the Idv/Rtv arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm. In conclusion, Rtv-boosed Sqv and Idv were found to have comparable antiretroviral effects in the doses studied